Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
An Iranian missile hit an Israeli governmental compound in Haifa.
Talks begin in Geneva between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and the E3.
Al Mayadeen correspondent: The E3 will present Araghchi with a four-point European plan that includes a complete end to uranium enrichment in Iran.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi arrives at the venue of the negotiations that will soon begin with the E3.
Araghchi: The Israeli attacks on nuclear facilities in Iran are serious war crimes.
Araghchi: We are determined to defend our territorial integrity and sovereignty with full force.
Araghchi: We were supposed to meet with the Americans on June 15 to draft a highly promising agreement regarding our nuclear program.
Araghchi: The unjustified Israeli attack on Iran is a violation of International Humanitarian Law Article 33.
Araghchi: Iran is facing aggression that cannot be justified in any way, and justifying this aggression is an act of complicity.
Araghchi: "Israel" bombed nuclear facilities that are under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Study: Republicans adjust moral beliefs to be more aligned with Trump

  • By Al Mayadeen Net
  • Source: PsyPost
  • 1 Feb 2022 23:11
  • 1 Shares
4 Min Read

The findings of a political psychology study suggest that people, particularly Republicans, revise their moral foundations to align with their favorite political candidate - in the case of 2016, that was Trump.

  • x
  • Study: Republicans adjust moral beliefs to be more aligned with Trump
    In 2016: Republicans and Democrats were at a heated match in the US elections. 

When one prefers a political candidate, 'moral inconsistencies' between the person and the candidate are resolved and patched up to create a sense of alignment with the candidate itself. 

A study published in Political Psychology, a scientific journal, examines how voters - Republicans and Democrats - revise their perceptions of political candidates and leaders to align with their moral beliefs. 

The study also took into account the elections in 2016, which found that Republicans - but not Democrats - revised their moral beliefs to reduce inconsistency with candidate Donald Trump. 

“A lot of work in political science research shows how voters are often ‘followers,’ adjusting their views on issues to match the messages they get from their party’s leaders. We wanted to see if that pattern extended to moral beliefs as well, as morality is usually assumed to be more stable and thus exerting a causal influence on political preferences such as candidate choice,” explained William Kidd and Joseph A. Vitriol, the authors of the study. 

The study was conducted by analyzing data from the 2016 US elections.

“You could see this assumption play out in the 2016 campaign, where both the media and the Clinton campaign treated Republican votes as ‘gettable’ due to differences between the typical Republican positions on moral issues and what positions Trump held. However, we expected voters would be motivated to resolve those differences in some way (either adjusting their own views or how they viewed the candidates) in order to justify their original decision of which candidate to support.”

This study was conducted by analyzing data from the 2016 US elections. The study recruited 3,557 US citizens as their attitudes in July, September, October, and November 2016 were measured. It was done on 4 waves. 

In the first wave of the study, voters' moral foundations were obtained and measured. 

In the second wave, participants were randomly assigned to report how they perceive Clinton or Trump's moral foundations (depending on the group they were assigned to). 

In the third wave, both measures of moral foundations were repeated. 

In the fourth wave, voters' choices of candidates were taken.

“Political leadership is moral leadership,” the researchers told PsyPost

The results showed that participants projected their moral foundations on their favored candidate: self-reported moral foundations acted as predictors for perceptions of Trump's moral foundations in wave two, and this was also observed among participants oriented towards Clinton.

Trump supporters appear to incline their moral beliefs to achieve further proximity with Trump's moral foundations (as perceived). Perceptions of Trump during the second wave altered how supporters perceived their own moral beliefs at the third. 

However, this trend was not found among Clinton supporters.

“Political leadership is moral leadership,” the researchers told PsyPost. “Many voters revise even their fundamental views of what they describe as right and wrong based on their perceptions of the candidates they support. Ideas and positions that might have seemed out of bounds can become normalized very quickly if they receive support from political leaders.”

“That voters adjust their ‘perceptions’ of the candidates is also likely a reason partisan conflict often seems so intractable, as voters from each party may not even share a common understanding of the candidates in question, limiting any form of reasoned debate.”

“It’s hard to determine if the differences we find between Clinton and Trump supporters are due to differences between Democrats and Republicans more broadly or if the results reflect unique qualities of those particular candidates,” Kidd and Vitriol explained. “We’ve found evidence in our follow-up work in the 2020 election for both possibilities, with Biden supporters seeming to show a bit more congruence in self-candidate moral beliefs than Clinton supporters did but still less than Trump supporters show.”

  • political psychology
  • Psychology
  • Joe Biden
  • Donald Trump

Most Read

Iranian missiles impact Israeli sites in Tel Aviv in 2nd wave

Iran's missiles impact 'strategic' Israeli site in Tel Aviv

  • Politics
  • 14 Jun 2025
Bin Salman: Islamic world backs Iran in call to Pezeshkian

MBS says Islamic world backs Iran in call with Pezeshkian

  • MENA
  • 15 Jun 2025
Iran launches 9th wave of Op. True Promise 3, destroys IOF air defense

Iran launches 9th wave of Op. True Promise 3, destroys IOF air defense

  • MENA
  • 17 Jun 2025
Smoke rises after an Iranian ballistic missile directly struck Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, June 13, 2025 (AP)

Op. True Promise 3: Iran's ballistic missiles strike Tel Aviv

  • MENA
  • 13 Jun 2025

Coverage

All
The Ummah's Martyrs

Read Next

All
Netanyahu stuns by postponing son’s wedding over Iran war
Politics

Netanyahu sparks outrage citing son’s wedding delay as Iran war cost

French court postpones verdict to July 17 on Georges Abdallah
Europe

French court postpones verdict on Georges Abdallah to July 17

Perseverance to shorten war: Iran's Larijani
Politics

Larijani says Iran to hold IAEA chief accountable after war ends

Damage to the Weizmann Institute of Science from an Iranian missile strike in Rehovot, Thursday, June 19, 2025. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)
Politics

'Catastrophic loss': Iranian blow to Weizmann’s war-linked facilities

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS