Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
Larijani: Yesterday, Tom Barrack said that if Lebanon does not comply with our demands to disarm Hezbollah, then it should expect the consequences, meaning the imposition of Israeli aggression
Larijani: Tom Barrack tried to impose his diktats on Lebanon, but was later infuriated when he realized that Lebanon was different
Larijani: Iran does not refuse negotiations and has never left the dialogue table, but what is required today is negotiations with predetermined outcomes
Larijani: We are not saying that we will not engage in talks, but any such talks should be of a realistic nature
Larijani: The enemies' demands are endless, and what we really need is a national resistance that puts an end to the enemies' ambitions
Larijani: The enemies demand that we not possess a nuclear industry, but tomorrow they will demand that we reduce the range of our missiles and execute their orders in the region
Secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Ali Larijani: It is very clear that the enemies' goal is to subjugate the Iranian people and break their will
Iranian government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani: The Foreign Ministry has received messages to resume talks, and we will announce the details in due course
Pete Hegseth announces US strike on a vessel in the Caribbean Sea, which killed three people on board.
Peskov: Moscow is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela and is keen for relations between Caracas and Washington to remain calm.

Germany's Intervention in Afghanistan

  • Manuel Ochsenreiter Manuel Ochsenreiter
  • Source: Al Mayadeen
  • 16 Jul 2021 19:34
  • 1 Shares
5 Min Read

Why should Germany occupy a country in Central Asia? Because the Americans told us to do so.

  • x
  • Germany's Intervention in Afghanistan

Seriously – one wants to switch off all the political talk shows these days. So many Western mainstream journalists and politicians are discussing Afghanistan, and all of them “are not surprised at all” about the fact, that the West totally failed over there. These mainstream bigmouths in the talk shows were the biggest supporters of this disastrous military mission just some time ago. How low, how hypocritical can representatives of the liberal elite go? Where were their smart opinions in the last 20 years? Why didn´t we hear anything of them when the coffins with our fallen soldiers arrived back in their homeland? The answer is easy: They kept the mouths shot because it wasn´t opportune to speak out. 

Some days ago, the last Western troops returned from their 20 years long Afghanistan adventure. Germany participated as well. When the last German soldiers came back home, no minister, no chancellor, and no president welcomed them on the airfield. This undignified comeback of the soldiers of the Bundeswehr (German Federal Defence) made many Germans upset. And they have all reason and right to be.

For 20 years Germany was sending sons and also daughters to the Hindu Kush (killer of the Indians) on behalf of our big hegemon USA. More than 50 German soldiers died on a battlefield so far away not just in terms of Geographic’s, but also in terms of morals and reason. 

Just to be clear: There didn´t “happen so many mistakes” in this NATO mission in Afghanistan. The whole mission was a horrible mistake itself. From the very first day it was wrong. Those, who said that openly, in 2001, were stigmatized by mainstream media either as “Taliban friends”, as stubborn nationalists, or as kind of lunatic pacifists. In reality, the vast majority of the opponents of the Afghanistan mission were concerned about our soldiers, didn´t see any interest in this adventure and maybe knew a little bit about the bloody history of earlier attempts to fight in Afghanistan by the Soviets and the British. But in 2001, reason was not so much present, after Washington pressed its European allies in a war against the Taliban somewhere far away. Back then, the majority of the Germans were strongly against any participation in this military operation. But already in 2001, “liberal democracy” didn't necessarily mean to let the majority decide. The German defense minister back then, seriously stated that the “security of Germany is defended as well at the Hindu Kush”. The laughing from Washington about That impressive example of total submission to US interests and the ability to tell lies to your own people must have been heard even in Berlin. 

Related News

The media counteroffensive: The Cuban experience

Leaked: Britain’s Ukrainian sniper training plot

And while German governments, first the social democratic under Gerhard Schröder, and then the Christian Democratic under Angela Merkel “defended” German security in the valleys of the Hindu Kush, Germany itself became a hot spot for terrorist attacks by Al-Qaida affiliated extremists. 

The Afghanistan military operation was always hard to explain for all German governments. Why were German soldiers there? What was their purpose? The justifications of the government included the typical hysterical liberal catalogue of values. German soldiers were there to “protect human rights”, here and there, they were also doing something for the “civil society” over there, and of course, they also were defending “equal rights” for the Afghan women females. It sounded more like an army of social street workers than an armed force. But the coffins coming back once in a while, were frequent reminders that Germany actually participated in a military occupation of another nation. And why should Germany occupy a country in Central Asia? Because the Americans told us to do so. We, Germans served in Afghanistan as kind of Auxiliary troops of Washington, just like all the other Western armies did there. America did as well, but what was the best they did? They executed their geopolitical military operation and “outsourced” a big part of the risks to their so-called allies.

Since the Western coalition left Afghanistan, the Taliban took control of the country, province by province. They might be soon again the rulers of the country. 20 years of Western occupation didn´t seem to have weakened them. Only a total ignorant might be honestly surprised. In these 20 years, the Americans were doing everything to cleanse their bad reputation in the region: war crimes, misbehaving, domination, and arrogance. 

And what about Europe? Was there really no other option than participating together with the Americans in this occupation mission? That´s what our political elite tries to make us believe – that there was “no alternative”. But there were plenty of options. The German army – for example – is a so-called “parliamentary army”. In these 20 years, the German parliament frequently discussed the operation, and the majority of our deputies prolonged the mission. The German Bundestag (the German federal parliament) agreed 20 times, while the majority of the people were against it. There were 20 chances simply to say “stop” – out of so many reasons. But the mainstream parties always empathized with our alleged “responsibility” as a part of the Western coalition and spoke about the importance of spreading our “liberal values” to the last valley of the Hindu Kush mountains. One could even say: That sounds a bit lunatically megalomaniac. At least, that’s what our liberal elites learned from their masters in Washington.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • United States
  • US troops in Afghanistan
  • Afghanistan
  • Germany
Manuel Ochsenreiter

Manuel Ochsenreiter

journalist, author and publisher.

Most Read

All
What Marr evidently didn't seem to understand was that Hedges isn't saying that Western journalists manipulate the truth, but that they systematically amplify Israeli narratives they know are false. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Western journalists know they have a case to answer for their betrayal of Gaza, and it frightens them

  • Opinion
  • 24 Oct 2025
Manufacturing civil war: The Zionist doctrine to destroy resistance

Manufacturing civil war: The Zionist doctrine to destroy resistance

  • Opinion
  • 21 Oct 2025
It is no secret that removing Russia from Syria in preparation for isolating it in Libya and Africa is a Western goal. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab el-Hajj)

Will Damascus be willing to pay the price to restore relations with Moscow?

  • Feature
  • 25 Oct 2025
Overcoming the modern Kali Yuga requires a civilizational renaissance based not only on the mental and cultural decolonization of Black peoples, but also on their physical and metaphysical unity. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Black Originism versus globalized Kali-Yuga negrophobia

  • Opinion
  • 22 Oct 2025

Coverage

All
Gaza: An Epic of Resilience and Valor

More from this writer

All
German Federal Elections: Rocky Horror Meddling Show

German Federal Elections: Rocky Horror Meddling Show

The "Friend“ Who Was Never One

The "Friend“ Who Was Never One

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS