Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
Iranian sources: Window to arrive at diplomatic resolution for nuclear file still open, E3 must act rationally.
Iranian sources: Iranian responses to E3 pressure on IAEA to politicize Iran file are well-measured and technical, but if E3 move to use snapback mechanism, this would change everything, as Iran's policy regarding nuclear program would change entirely.
Iranian sources: Iran has shown in past that it would not sit idly by while E3 violate its nuclear rights.
Iranian sources: Iran reaffirmed, through diplomatic channels with Europe that it would respond to any escalatory step in nuclear issue.
Iranian sources: Despite this, E3 did not change course; Iran sees continued pressures against its positive steps as a new European move toward enforcing snapback mechanism.
Iranian sources: Iran warned E3 representatives in Istanbul that any move to escalate through IAEA will reflect negatively on indirect talks with US, and attempts to reach good deal.
Iranian sources: Despite change in atmosphere and Iran announcing readiness to give more positive messages, pressures are ongoing.
Iranian political sources: E3's pressures on IAEA began before start of indirect talks between Tehran and Washington.
Iranian political sources to Al Mayadeen: Despite Iranian messages of goodwill, E3 continue to pursue path of pressuring IAEA.
Iranian political sources to Al Mayadeen regarding E3's attempts to pressure IAEA to produce negative report on Iranian nuclear program.

Let common sense return in Australia’s China policy

  • Ding Heng Ding Heng
  • Source: Al Mayadeen English
  • 20 Mar 2024 18:19
  • 2 Shares
6 Min Read

Common sense tells us that stable relations between Australia and China help maintain the mutually beneficial economic ties between the two countries.

  • x
  • Let common sense return in Australia’s China policy
    China-Australia relations should by no means go backward (Illustrated by Mahdi Rtail; Al Mayadeen English)

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s visit to Australia this week is the latest sign of a thaw in the relations between Beijing and Canberra. When the two sides managed to arrange a meeting between Xi Jinping and Anthony Albanese on the sidelines of the 2022 G20 Bali summit, the Australian PM suggested that the meeting was in and of itself a successful outcome. His comment had a point at the time, given the challenges encountered by the bilateral relations when his predecessor Scott Morrison was in office. Australia has many reasons to cherish the relations’ upward trajectory at the moment.

This year marks the 10th anniversary since China and Australia signed a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP). From China’s perspective, this official definition of relations has multiple connotations. “Comprehensive” requires the two sides to cooperate in as many areas as possible. “Strategic” means that how their relations develop could generate implications that go beyond the two countries. A bottom line for “partnership” is that the two sides can’t view each other as adversary.

However, Australia has previously taken moves against China that were not in line with CSP’s spirits, such as banning Huawei from its 5G network in 2018 and calling for a so-called Covid inquiry in 2020. The latter, for example, was a political move catering to an anti-China sentiment, rather than a meaningful step that made scientific sense.

Those moves were taken by Canberra with an awareness that, for certain products such as iron ore, China had no good alternative to buying them from Australia. Frankly, that has set a bad precedent of taking the trade opportunities provided by China for granted and even abusing them. Think about a scenario like this: If a shop keeps offending a customer, knowing he or she has to buy some products from it anyway, how would this customer feel? Any normal person would probably seek to reduce purchases from this shop, especially on items that can be found elsewhere. That’s exactly how China responded to Australia’s hostility.

Related News

Colombia's Silk Road turn: Breaking the chains of US hegemony

The fulfillment of Trumps dreams

Fortunately, after Albanese took office, cool heads have to some degree returned to Canberra’s China policy. After meeting Xi in Bali, Albanese paid a visit to China last November. That trip saw him attend an annual import expo held in Shanghai, which sent a message that Australia cares about trade with China. A high-level official dialogue mechanism resumed last year following a three-year suspension. Australia has also announced that, after a security review, it would not cancel a Chinese company’s lease of the northern port of Darwin.

A fundamental aspect of China-Australia relations is that they are two highly complementary economies. Natural resources from Australia help power factories in China, and there are plenty of Chinese consumers who love Australian wines and agricultural products. For Australia, trade with China is worth more than its trade with the US, Japan, and South Korea combined. During the 2008 global financial crisis, Australia was the only major economy in the West to avoid a recession mainly because of its exports to China. The status quo in their economic and trade ties is unlikely to change significantly in the foreseeable future. For instance, bilateral trade in goods grew by over 8% in 2023, and China continues to be the largest source (over 20%) of international students for Australia’s education sector. Common sense tells us that stable relations help maintain the mutually beneficial economic ties between the two countries.

On security matters, it looks like Canberra will continue to align with Washington, and there are several specific issues on which Beijing and Canberra don’t see eye to eye with each other. China is not against the Australia-US alliance per se. However, there is every reason to believe that the US is taking advantage of this alliance to counter China, if, as one example, we think about the development of the AUKUS. Apart from a concern about the potential threat to its own national security, China is also – perhaps even more – worried about the prospect of AUKUS contributing to a nuclear arms race in the Asia Pacific, and this legitimate concern is shared by regional countries, such as Malaysia and Indonesia. Under AUKUS, Australia is in essence exploiting a loophole in the rules of the International Atomic Energy Agency to access naval reactors. No non-nuclear-weapon state has done this in the past, and the risk of nuclear proliferation is real.

In fact, a closer alliance with the US at the cost of relations with China doesn’t serve Australia’s best interests. University of Technology Sydney’s Australia-China Relations Institute once conducted a study in 2021, when China-Australia relations were at a low point. The study found that the value of 12 categories of Australian exports to China fell by $12.6 billion in the first nine months of that year compared with 2019. During the same period, however, the value of US exports of the same commodities to China increased by $4.6 billion. In other words, in terms of trade, the US was a main beneficiary of the bad China-Australia relations at the time.

With that in mind, it’s probably not surprising when a recent poll by The Guardian found only one in five Australians said their country should be primarily an ally of the US. By comparison, almost twice as many respondents believed that Australia should be an independent middle power with influence in the Asia-Pacific region. Such a pattern in the public opinion ought to be taken seriously by Australia’s foreign policy decision-makers. To say the least, China-Australia relations should by no means go backward to its previous lows.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • United States
  • Asian-Pacific
  • Asia Pacific
  • US
  • AUKUS security pact
  • China
  • Australia
  • Pacific Ocean
  • Australian PM
  • AUKUS
  • Anthony Albanese
Ding Heng

Ding Heng

Radio host and columnist.

Most Read

All
Although the background information does not indicate direct US involvement, considering the broader geopolitical context, it is plausible that the US would have an indirect impact. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab El-Hajj)

Did 'Israel', US fight a proxy war with China in South Asia during the India-Pakistan escalation?

  • Feature
  • 19 May 2025
The two countries need to sit down and resolve the crisis with maturity, to consider carefully that they could be being manipulated to be easily dominated. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Algeria and Mali, divided and almost conquered

  • Opinion
  • 25 May 2025
The spirit of Bandung: 70 years on

The spirit of Bandung: 70 years on

  • Opinion
  • 18 May 2025
Trump and Biden both pretended to be fighting Netanyahu

Trump and Biden both pretended to be fighting Netanyahu

  • Analysis
  • 28 May 2025

Coverage

All
The Ummah's Martyrs

More from this writer

All
China remains a reliable player in global trade

China remains a reliable player in global trade

Imposing tariffs on Chinese goods shipped to the US hurts China, but American consumers are the victims as well. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab el-Hajj)

Let stability prevail over turbulence in China-US ties

The “Cold-war mentality” is something that China constantly warns against on the international stage. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab El-Hajj)

Why Europe needs to repair ties with China

For China, the vessel’s 1999 grounding was in and of itself illegitimate. Manila told Beijing back then that the grounding was accidental, promising to tow the ship away. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Why Philippines' current approach to South China Sea is risky

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS