Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
Local Syrian sources: Dozens of dead and wounded have arrived at Sweida hospitals as a result of ongoing clashes at several locations in the western Sweida countryside
Local sources: Civilians, including children and women, were injured in the al-Maqous neighborhood of Sweida, in Syria, as a result of ongoing clashes
Israeli media outlet: Security incident reported in the Gaza Strip
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson: No new date or venue has been set for the meeting between Araghchi and Witkoff, and no negotiations will take place until the outcome is guaranteed
Palestinian platforms: Settlers storm Al-Aqsa Mosque complex under the protection of the occupation police
Palestinian platforms: The IOF detonated a booby-trapped robot east of the al-Zaytoun neighborhood, south of Gaza City
Syrian Defense: We call on all parties in Sweida to cooperate with security forces and exercise restraint
Al Mayadeen's correspondent: The Lebanese Army is continuing its investigations and will later announce any information that does not affect the confidentiality of the investigation
Al Mayadeen's correspondent: It has not yet been determined whether the detainees belong to ISIS or another organization
Al Mayadeen's correspondent: Around 10 people of different nationalities, including Lebanese nationals, were detained

Will China-Taiwan tension lead to China-US conflict?

  • Joe Joubran Joe Joubran
  • Source: Al Mayadeen English
  • 19 Jun 2022 14:49
  • 6 Shares
7 Min Read

The unbelievable international tension after the framework of war in Ukraine, the global alignments, and the mutual mobilization associated with this war convey a great possibility of confrontation between China and the US.

  • x
  • Will China-Taiwan tension lead to China-US conflict?
    Will China-Taiwan tension lead to China-US conflict?

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in a rare springtime version of Davos, veteran US diplomat Henry Kissinger said: “A direct confrontation should be avoided and Taiwan cannot be the core of the negotiations, because it is between China and the United States”.

Kissinger stressed that the United States should not develop something of a ‘two-China’ solution, by any gradual process, so that China will continue to exercise the patience that has been exercised up until now. He added that Washington and Beijing must seek to avoid putting Taiwan at the center of their tense diplomatic relationship, adding that the need for the world’s two largest economies to avoid direct confrontation is in the interest of global peace.

His comments come shortly after President Joe Biden, at a joint news conference with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, said that the US would be prepared to intervene militarily if China invaded the self-governed island.

  • Figure 1: China and Taiwan
    Figure 1: China and Taiwan

Biden’s remarks during his Asian trip

During his first trip to Asia as a president, Biden warns that the US would defend Taiwan militarily in case of an attack by China, drawing a direct comparison to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. He added: “We agree with the ‘One China’ policy”, but the idea that Taiwan can be taken by force, is not appropriate. It would dislocate the entire region and be another action similar to what happened in Ukraine.

Biden’s remarks appeared to mark a break in Washington’s deliberate and long-held tradition of “strategic ambiguity” over Taiwan. The White House quickly sought to downplay the comments, saying they do not reflect a change in policy. The White House officials said that Biden’s comments simply repeated a decision made through a 1979 law that the United States would provide Taiwan with the military means for self-defense.

  • Figure 2: US arms Taiwan
    Figure 2: US arms Taiwan

Biden has also previously made similar comments, before his assistants walk them back. But in the current situation, during a presidential visit to Seoul and Tokyo and the West’s urgent confrontation with Russia over Ukraine, the words had a more powerful meaning and provoked reactions by various countries in the region.

Asian Reactions

Related News

Kissinger, Orientalism and the Other

Zelensky’s propensity for war is evident in Kiev’s castigation of Henry Kissinger

Taiwanese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Joanne Ou said that her agency “sincerely welcomed” Biden’s comments, but the Chinese ministry’s spokesman Wang Wenbin expressed his government’s “strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition” to them. Beijing claims Taiwan is an inalienable part of its territory. “No one should underestimate the strong determination, firm will and formidable ability of the Chinese people”, Wang said at a regular press briefing, according to the state-run Global Times.

The joint air force patrols, for about 13 hours in the skies, above the Sea of ​​Japan and the East China Sea, executed by the Chinese and the Russian air force is accurate proof of the mutual support and the strategic coordination at all levels. Moreover, this event conveys a clear political message to the whole world. 

The partnership of the United States with India, Japan and Australia, which is reinforced by US participation in the summit of the Quad, is meant in a way to counter China’s global power. The outlines of a new trade framework announced by the Biden administration, which is meant to strengthen US economic ties with Indo-Pacific nations other than China. 

The four Quad nations share security and economic interests, but the grouping exists for reasons that mirror the purpose of Biden’s first Asia trip as president: to counter China’s growing military and economic power.

Conclusion

Many questions could be imposed in the current situation: 

Do these comments reflect the real policy of the United States towards Taiwan and against China?

Do these comments match the strategic goal which aims to defend Taiwan and prevent China from invading the island by force?

Does this strategy serve the national interest of the United States and the interest of its allies and partners in the region and in the world?

The policy of strategic ambiguity toward Taiwan has long been maintained by the United States, meaning it is intentionally unclear what it would do if it comes to defending Taiwan. The “one China” policy is a long-standing time of diplomatic pace under which the United States recognizes China’s position that there is only one Chinese government, without accepting Beijing’s view that Taiwan is under its rightful control.

China’s Foreign Ministry’s direct reaction was by expressing “strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition” to the remarks. Under the “one China” policy, a cornerstone of diplomatic relations between Washington and Beijing, the US diplomatically acknowledges China’s position that there is only one Chinese government. China claims Taiwan as part of its own territory and has been putting pressure on the island to accept its rule. As a matter of fact, Taiwan is at the doorstep of China (100 miles =161 kilometers), while the distance from the United States to Taiwan is 12,261 kilometers (7,619 miles).

The US maintains a strong unofficial relationship with Taiwan, and Washington supplies military equipment to the island in accordance with the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, which does not require the US to intervene militarily to defend Taiwan if China invades, but makes it a policy to ensure the island has the resources to defend itself and to prevent Beijing from unilaterally unifying the island.

The unbelievable international tension after the framework of war in Ukraine, the global alignments, and the mutual mobilization associated with this war convey a great possibility of a confrontation between China and the United States.

Beijing did not agree with Washington’s efforts to expand political and economic pressure on Russia, in order to terminate its military operation in Ukraine. China was, somehow, a great supporter of Russia, and at the same time the biggest obstacle to the US economic strategy plan against Russia.

Both China and the US are the two main members out of five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) (besides the Russian Federation, France, and the United Kingdom). Every member has the right to the negative vote (Veto) which could cancel any UNSC decision. They are superpowers having great military (including weapons of mass destruction, WMD) and economic capabilities that could start a new global war (WW III).

Finally, the international society and the United Nations organization precisely, are responsible for keeping peace, security and stability in the world, by avoiding any military clash which may lead to war. They should be directly involved more and more in the peacekeeping process by taking all measures and procedures to find a political solution to any conflict between any two or more nations or parties. All problems should be solved by direct negotiations seeking peace and consequently saving lives.

It is necessary and sufficient to avoid committing any critical or historical mistakes against human rights and citizens of all nations in general. The international society must always strive to find solutions, and Intensify all efforts, taking into account the legitimate national interests of all parties in concern; China, US, and Taiwan. 

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • Henry Kissinger
  • United States
  • Taiwan
  • Russia
  • China-Taiwan
  • China
  • Ukraine
  • Joe Biden
  • One China Principle
Joe Joubran

Joe Joubran

Analyst

Most Read

All
How is it that the Western regimes, which claimed to support the fake revolutions of Lebanon, Libya, and Syria, waged constant war against the actual Ansar Allah-led revolution in Yemen? (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Understanding Yemen 1/2: The Revolution

  • Opinion
  • 30 Jun 2025
Why Netanyahu is on the ropes

Why Netanyahu is on the ropes

  • Analysis
  • 4 Jul 2025
Ukraine’s Corporate Carve-Up Collapses?

Ukraine’s Corporate Carve-Up Collapses?

  • Analysis
  • 11 Jul 2025
Africa’s top university’s ‘Gaza Resolutions’ outrages pro-'Israel' lobby

Africa’s top university’s ‘Gaza Resolutions’ outrages pro-'Israel' lobby

  • Analysis
  • 4 Jul 2025

Coverage

All
War on Iran

More from this writer

All
Who is the end user of the US weapons sent to Ukraine?

Who is the end user of the US weapons sent to Ukraine?

Ukrainian crisis and the International Treaties

Ukrainian crisis and the International Treaties

Is USA losing its position as a great power against China?

Is the US losing its position as a great power against China?

The relation between US defense policy and the National Security budget

The relation between US defense policy and the National Security budget

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS