Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
Al Mayadeen's correspondent in South Lebanon: Injuries reported after an Israeli aircraft struck a lumber mill between the towns of Toura and al-Abbasiya
Al Mayadeen's correspondent in South Lebanon: Israeli aircraft launch strike on outskirts of Toura, Tyre district.
Hezbollah: We pledge to remain in position of honor, dignity, and righteousness, to defend our land, our people, and the aspirations of future generations.
Hezbollah: We highly value patience of our steadfast and proud people, who endure oppression and aggression alongside us in the hope of preserving national sovereignty and dignity.
Hezbollah: From this perspective, we address current developments, reaffirming to all that this is the time to unify efforts to halt the Zionist violations, aggression, and escalation against our country
Hezbollah: Legitimate defense does not fall under framework of “decisions of war or peace”; rather, it is exercise of our right to resist an enemy that imposes war upon our land, refuses to cease its assaults, seeking to subdue our state.
Hezbollah: As a founding component of Lebanon, the nation we are committed to as a final homeland for all its children, we reaffirm our legitimate right to resist occupation and aggression.
Hezbollah: Negotiations [with "Israel"] carry no national interest and pose existential risks to Lebanon’s sovereignty and entity.
Hezbollah: Lebanon must not, under any circumstances, yield to aggressive blackmail or be lured into political negotiations with the Zionist enemy.
Hezbollah: With this savage enemy, backed by the American tyrant, there can be no room for maneuver or deceit.

Ukrainian crisis and the International Treaties

  • Joe Joubran Joe Joubran
  • Source: Al Mayadeen
  • 1 May 2022 23:43
  • 7 Shares
7 Min Read

Russia may be satisfied by controlling a part of Ukraine, especially the border areas and those inhabited by groups of Russian origin, although extending its control to all territories of Ukraine could convey a great risk.

  • x
  • Ukrainian crisis and the International Treaties
    The Treaty establishes the Open Skies regime for the conduct of short-notice, unarmed, observation flights by States Parties over the territories of other States Parties

Dwight Eisenhower (1955) was the first US President who suggested the idea of a regime of unarmed aerial observation flights to promote confidence, predictability, and stability. On 12 May 1989, U.S. President George Bush proposed the creation of an Open Skies regime, which expanded on President Eisenhower’s concept. According to the tension and diplomatic clashes at the international level, which leads to the military engagement in Ukraine, there is serious talk about the fate and effectiveness of the international treaties and agreements, Such as the Open Skies Treaty.

1- The Open Skies Treaty

The Treaty on Open Skies authorizes the militaries of States Parties to conduct unarmed reconnaissance flights over other States Parties' territories. It was Signed on 24 March 1992, and on 1 January 2002 entered into Force.

In December 1989, the participants of the North Atlantic Council Meeting in Brussels issued the “Open Skies: Basic Elements” document calling for the establishment of an Open Skies regime for members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact to promote openness and transparency, build confidence, and facilitate verification of arms control and disarmament agreements. During the meeting between NATO and the Warsaw Pact in Ottawa on 12 February 1990, Canada and Hungary launched a similar initiative.

2- Provisions

The Treaty establishes the Open Skies regime for the conduct of short-notice, unarmed, observation flights by States Parties over the territories of other States Parties. It gives each State Party the right to conduct and the obligation to accept observation flights over their territory.

The Treaty establishes a “passive quota” for each State Party, which is the total number of observation flights that each State Party is obliged to accept over its territory, and an “active quota,” which is the number of observation flights that a State Party shall have the right to conduct over the territory of each of the other States Parties.

The Treaty entitled the States Parties to form groups and redistribute their “active quotas,” and to have common total “active and passive quotas.” To conduct an observation flight, an observing State Party must provide at least 72-hour notice to the State Party it wishes to observe.

3- Verification and Compliance

The Treaty established an Open Skies Consultative Commission (OSCC) that conducts its work by consensus. This commission is in charge of the questions related to compliance with the Treaty, and seeks to resolve ambiguities and differences of interpretation should they occur, consider applications for accession to the Treaty, and take care of technical and administrative measures.

Related News

Kyrgyzstan’s forgotten colour revolution

Zionists target the US MAGA movement amid evolving 'influencer' strategy

 It convenes in monthly plenary meetings at the headquarters of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) in Vienna.

The Treaty provides for a periodic review conference to review the Treaty’s implementation to be convened three years after the entry into force of the Treaty and at five-year intervals thereafter.

4- Developments

After President Putin revealed the five new weapons (Hypersonic) for the first time in March 2018, the United States policymakers started a series of withdrawals from the missile treaties. They also went developing "Deceptive" missiles, such as the multi-tasking "AEGIS" system, they later withdrew from the Treaty on Short and Medium-Range Missiles, and then from the Treaty on Open Skies, only to agree recently to extend the "START 3", after they felt that they are no longer of any value in terms of limiting strategic capabilities, according to what they possess - the Americans and the Russians - of nuclear capabilities and means of launching this treaty.

On 22 May 2020, U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo announced the United States’ intention to withdraw from the Treaty on the Open Skies. He cited claimed Russian violations of the Treaty as precipitating U.S. withdrawal.  On 22 November 2020, the United States formally withdrew from the treaty.

On 15 January, the Russian Foreign Ministry Sergei Lavrov announced that Russia would initiate steps to withdraw from the Open Skies Treaty. He later suggested that Russia would reconsider should the United States return to the treaty. In response to a question regarding his statement at a press briefing on 2 February, US State Department Spokesperson Ned Price indicated that the Biden Administration was “studying the issue” and would “take a decision in due course.”

On 19 May, the Russian State Duma adopted a bill to formally endorse a withdrawal from the Open Skies Treaty. The bill cited the United States’ continued ability to receive information acquired via the treaty from its NATO allies as precipitating the decision.

On 27 May, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman informed the Russian government that the United States will not rejoin the Open Skies Treaty.

5. Ukraine Crisis
 

  • Figure 1: Ukraine
    Figure 1: Ukraine (Source)

According to negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, it is clear that both parties can't reach a solution or an agreement soon. Especially since Russia considers that the Western camp was responsible for the ending of the Soviet Union (Gorbachev). 

Accordingly, Russia could not accept the reversing of the former Soviet Union countries, especially Ukraine, which is considered the second country of the former Soviet Union besides Russia due to its geographic location between Russia and the European Union.

The Western Camp, and specifically the United States and the European Union, will not abandon the current situation that they have pursued for decades and achieved after their great effort in the containment process against Russia, and therefore they will not give up easily.

6. Conclusion

In the end, there should be high-level negotiations, and thus both camps should get some benefits after compromising.  

Now, it seems that Russia has broken the military power of Ukraine, and the Ukrainian people felt disappointed because of the Western camp attitude or at least of being left alone in this war. That is why the Western camp felt responsible for supporting the Ukrainian people with weapons and funding their resistance.

Russia may be satisfied by conquering a part of Ukraine, especially the border areas and those inhabited by groups of Russian origin. Occupying all territories of Ukraine could convey a great risk; the wise decision is to avoid facing any armed resistance that may lead to the exhaustion of the Russian army for a long period.

Finally, the Western camp is trying to prevent the total invasion of Ukraine and to avoid the loss of confidence of the Ukrainian people by applying economic and financial sanctions to constrain Russia, and by supporting the Ukrainian resistance.

On the other side, Europe will suffer from a severe energy crisis as a result of stopping the pumping of the Russian gas to the western countries so that they have to find alternative sources.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • United States
  • Nato
  • Russia
  • US
Joe Joubran

Joe Joubran

Analyst

Russia & NATO

Russia & NATO

As the Draconian Western-led sanctions on Russia exacerbate the economic crisis worldwide, and as Russian troops gain more ground despite the influx of military aid into Ukraine, exposing US direct involvement in bio-labs spread across Eastern Europe and the insurgence of neo-Nazi groups… How will things unfold?

Most Read

All
What Marr evidently didn't seem to understand was that Hedges isn't saying that Western journalists manipulate the truth, but that they systematically amplify Israeli narratives they know are false. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Western journalists know they have a case to answer for their betrayal of Gaza, and it frightens them

  • Opinion
  • 24 Oct 2025
It is no secret that removing Russia from Syria in preparation for isolating it in Libya and Africa is a Western goal. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab el-Hajj)

Will Damascus be willing to pay the price to restore relations with Moscow?

  • Feature
  • 25 Oct 2025
If the West is to reclaim its moral compass, it must first confront the fear it created, and the lies it told to sustain it. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

How Islamophobia became a tool of Western politics

  • Feature
  • 23 Oct 2025
In the Zionist regime’s thinking, now is a historic opportunity to exterminate all those who resist it, eliminate Gaza entirely, and impose uncontested dominance over the region. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

What is the Israeli strategy in Gaza?

  • Opinion
  • 28 Oct 2025

Coverage

All
Gaza: An Epic of Resilience and Valor

More from this writer

All
Will China-Taiwan tension lead to China-US conflict?

Will China-Taiwan tension lead to China-US conflict?

Who is the end user of the US weapons sent to Ukraine?

Who is the end user of the US weapons sent to Ukraine?

Is USA losing its position as a great power against China?

Is the US losing its position as a great power against China?

The relation between US defense policy and the National Security budget

The relation between US defense policy and the National Security budget

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS