• Ar
  • Es
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Feature
  • Videos
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Feature
Videos
Infographs
In Pictures
  1. Home
  2. Hamzah Rifaat
  3. Articles
  4. Analysis
  5. Provocations and ideological bias do not constitute deterrence in the Asia Pacific
Analysis

Provocations and ideological bias do not constitute deterrence in the Asia Pacific

  • Hamzah RifaatHamzah Rifaat
  • Source: Al Mayadeen English
  • 25 Jan 23:53

With American and Japanese provocations being obvious, tensions can quickly escalate amid little effort from both the Kishida and the Biden administrations to initiate dialogues to diffuse tensions with Beijing.

  • Provocations and ideological bias do not constitute deterrence in the Asia Pacific

The Asia Pacific should not be a wrestling ground for geopolitical powerplay. These were the words of Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin while referring to controversial doctrines being operationalized by both the United States and Japan in the South China Sea. The truth is that the region which is supposed to be the engine of global economic growth is being systematically plunged into politics of confrontation and conflict. Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s meeting with President Joe Biden in Washington D.C. has exposed the Asia Pacific to undue provocations as a result of American parochialism, which does not constitute deterrence. In essence, China has every right to respond. 

Firstly, the need to ‘deter’ China is nonsensical given what has transpired. Kishida and Biden cited Beijing as a ‘mutual threat’ despite the fact that both the US and Japan have sought to undermine the ‘One China’ principle by making the subject of Taiwan an integral part of their military alliance. Furthermore, the joint statement of the US-Japan Security Consultative Committee is equally slanderous, where China’s legitimate right to initiate peaceful reunification with Taiwan is being equated with Beijing’s attempt to upset the ‘status quo’ in the region. That is not the case as Japan’s new National Security Strategy of 2022 is being actively supported by the Washington D.C. establishment and operationalized to pressurize Beijing to forgo its sovereignty and retreat from its legitimate claims. This undermines rather than reinforces deterrence in the Asia Pacific.  

If one examines the Japanese NSS of 2022 closely, then it is a massive departure from Japan’s former Pacifist stance since World War II and its renunciation of both war and aggression. The Kishida administration, however, plans to bolster Tokyo’s defense with offensive, attacking capabilities. As per its defense strategy documents, Japan would acquire counterstrike capabilities including hundreds of US-made Tomahawk cruise missiles that enable it to strike targets 1,500 miles away with an accuracy of 16 feet. Japan’s disproportionate fixation on curbing China as part of its alliance with the United States clearly suggests that its arsenal is capable of hitting China. In December 2022, Japan announced its largest military buildup since World War II by boosting its defense budget to $55 billion, or a 20% increase in its spending. This does not instill any sense of regional security and constitutes a direct threat to peace in the Asia Pacific instead. 

Additionally, the presence of cruise missiles will upset, not enforce the deterrence equation in the region. The vast majority of countries in the Asia Pacific adhere to principles of non-interference, neutrality, and respect for state sovereignty, such as Malaysia and Singapore, which enjoy amiable ties with China based on historical trade and apolitical cooperation. This is despite the fact that both countries have significant differences with Beijing over the latter’s approach in the South China Sea. However, unlike Tokyo, both sides believe in managing differences through diplomacy and dialogue in the absence of American intervention. Hence, any attempt to upset the status quo through military deployments will have an adverse impact on the freedom of navigation that both Japan and the United States purportedly claim to uphold. There are few takers for such reckless adventurism.

To witness US Nimitz aircraft carriers comprising of nuclear-powered, guided missiles and guided missile destroyers conducting what Washington D.C. claims are ‘maritime strike trainings’ in the South China Sea is not reassuring either. American military deployments can easily result in tit-for-tat reactions from Beijing as China has shown with its Shandong aircraft carrier that conducted realistic combat-oriented exercises. With American and Japanese provocations being obvious, tensions can quickly escalate amid little effort from both the Kishida and the Biden administrations to initiate dialogues to diffuse tensions with Beijing. Persistent tensions threaten deterrence stability which does not bode well for Asia Pacific security.

This is also not the first time that the United States has brandished the ‘deterrence’ card while justifying its military actions in the South China Sea. Its antagonism toward China is grounded in historical facts. In November 2022, just days after US Vice President Kamala Harris paid a trip to Manila and called for overflight in South China and pledged to launch an international campaign against China’s so-called ‘irresponsible’ behavior, a guided missile carrier, the USS Chancellorsville intruded into waters around the Spratly Islands as a violation of Chinese sovereignty. According to Chinese defense experts, the US aircraft carrier’s activities have little military significance beyond stirring up tensions and that is precisely what is happening with America’s alliance with Japan and the latter’s proclivity toward confrontation with China being obvious in 2023. 

The truth is that the presence of the United States will imperil peace in the Asia Pacific. Any mechanism for diffusing tensions has to be localized and among regional states. The region cannot become a convenient backyard for American imperialism or Washington D.C. courting allies such as Japan who then adopt offensive postures and controversial doctrines as tactics against China. False threat perceptions which are grounded in ideological bias and zero-sum mentalities will only create a Cold War theatre in the region that benefits no country. This is not what the Asia Pacific needs. 

Deterrence will slowly erode in the South China Sea unless strategic wisdom prevails.

The opinions mentioned in this article do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Al mayadeen, but rather express the opinion of its writer exclusively.
  • United States
  • Japan
  • Asian-Pacific
  • Asia Pacific
  • US
  • China
Hamzah Rifaat

Hamzah Rifaat

A broadcast journalist, analyst, and visiting fellow at the Stimson Center in Washington D.C.,2016.

Related Articles

All
The US-Japan new militarism will be a failure to contain China

The US-Japan new militarism will be a failure to contain China

Most Read

Neo-compradors: the leftist foot soldiers of Imperialism

Neo-compradors: the leftist foot soldiers of Imperialism

  • MENA
  • 2 Feb
Eastern Mediterranean very dangerous at seismic level: Hoogerbeets

Eastern Mediterranean very dangerous at seismic level: Hoogerbeets

  • MENA
  • 7 Feb
Western selective humanitarianism, Syria earthquake falls on deaf ears

Western selective humanitarianism, Syria earthquake falls on deaf ears

  • MENA
  • 6 Feb
Donetsk People's Republic head Denis Pushilin peaks during a news conference on February 23, 2022. (Reuters)

DPR Chief warns Ukrainian forces use drone-dropped chemical weapons

  • Europe
  • 6 Feb

Read this

All
A balloon intrusion jeopardizes peace between US and China
Articles

A balloon intrusion jeopardizes peace between US and China

  • Today
While Russia, Iran, India, Latin America, and Africa are trying their best to get rid of the hegemony of the West, the West is absolutely desperate to establish new alliances through which it may prevent the birth of this multipolar system.
Articles

The Core Issue

  • 8 Feb
Mike Pompeo's confessions
Articles

Mike Pompeo's confessions

  • 7 Feb
Hypocritical decisions taken by the Western ruling elites have been continuously lethal in Syria.
Articles

Syria: Don’t stab the cradle of civilisation three times in a...

  • 7 Feb
Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS