Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
President al-Mashat: Our armed forces, represented by our air defenses, will soon turn the Zionist enemy’s aircraft into a subject of ridicule.
President al-Mashat: Good news about the Zionist enemy’s aircraft used in aggression against our country will reach you soon, God willing.
President al-Mashat: Our armed forces will be able to deal with hostile Zionist aircraft without causing any harm to air or maritime navigation.
President al-Mashat: To ensure the safety of airliners, they must avoid navigating along the routes used by the Zionist entity to carry out aggression against our country.
Yemeni President Mahdi al-Mashat: For the safety of air and maritime navigation in areas where our armed forces operate, we have directed that the routes used by the Zionist enemy to attack our country be designated as dangerous.
Hamas official says despite this, Hamas leadership is currently undertaking a thorough review of the new proposal
Hamas official says the response fails to meet any of the just and legitimate demands of our people
Hamas official says it is clear that the Israeli response fundamentally seeks to entrench the occupation
Reuters citing Hamas official: Group received Israeli response to Witkoff proposal
Sources to Al Mayadeen: The news regarding a press conference tonight by the head of the Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip, Khalil Al-Hayya, is false.

Why IMEC could become a fading memory

  • Hannan Hussain Hannan Hussain
  • Source: Al Mayadeen English
  • 18 Sep 2023 17:23
5 Min Read

The tall promises of the IMEC about a 40 percent cut in India-Europe trade time deserve to be questioned for several reasons.

  • x
  • Why IMEC could become a fading memory
    Why IMEC could become a fading memory

In a show of triumph on the sidelines of the recently concluded G20 (Group of 20) Leaders’ Summit in New Delhi, India, and its partners announced an overly ambitious multinational rail and shipping project. The initiative, called the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), compromises of an eastern component linking India to the Arabian Gulf, and the Arabian Gulf to Europe on the northern front. “Across the corridor, we envision driving existing trade and manufacturing and strengthening food security and supply chains. Our approach aims to unlock new investments from partners, including the private sector, and spur the creation of quality jobs,” read a factsheet from the White House.

For all the noise and premature success narrative about cross-border ‘ship-to-rail’ transit networks, the contours of this wishful arrangement and its financial viability are increasingly under question.

Consider the deep-seated geopolitics of the corridor itself. Extending transportation links from the Middle East to India does not automatically guarantee ‘connectivity’ for an entire region at large. For instance, India is centered within South Asia, a region also home to Pakistan alongside several other nations with geographically strategic locations. By reducing South Asian connectivity to India alone, IMEC carries the deliberate impression of sidestepping connectivity for all in a bid to guarantee railway and port linkages to a single state. 

Similarly, Washington and New Delhi’s outsized lobbying for this corridor merits a closer look at the underlying motivations. Consider the Israeli occupation: it is deliberately billed as a key connectivity partner under IMEC, a blatant attempt to normalize the inclusion of an illegal occupation within a so-called trade and connectivity “game-changer.” In truth, this is another conscious effort by Washington to leverage the connectivity cover to force convergence of trade interests with the Israeli occupation. Let us be clear: none of these political motivations align with the stated goal of IMEC – to catalyze the “transformative integration of Asia, Europe and the Middle East.” 

Related News

The Supply Lines War

Competing global economic initiatives: A tale of two routes

Representatives of participating countries including the United States, India, European Union, and Arab states are also set to meet in the next sixty days to develop an action plan to produce a corridor timetable. By branching off into discussions, IMEC simultaneously raises the specter of implicit lobbying for interests that cater to the aspirations of pro-occupation forces, and threatens unwarranted tolerance of the Israeli occupation that has laid siege on Palestinian lands, rights and freedoms for decades.

On economics, tall promises about a 40 percent cut in India-Europe trade time deserve to be questioned. These are premature assumptions when sources of financing and cost-sharing mechanisms among states are yet to be hammered out. India appears to be taking a backseat on all these big issues, insisting that it will be connected by railroads but refusing to build them. Meanwhile, several European economies are facing domestic economic exigencies at home, resulting in fast-shrinking space for funds mobilization and drastic limits on generous overseas spending. The United States is in no position to punch beyond its weight either, given a sharply divided Congress on spending excesses and the recent pains of alarming debt. 

Even if Washington was able to deliver billions on its part, a dismal track record of infrastructure investment struggles to make the case for competence. Look no further than the much hyped-up Build Back Better World (B3W): it was sold as a sustainable counterweight to China’s massive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Fast forward, B3W is widely seen as dead on arrival with little prospects of growth, expansion or generous financing. It is here that Europe and Washington’s collective emphasis on IMEC is glaring proof that priorities have shifted in a completely different direction. 

As such, considerable ambiguity on the prospective investment and trade returns of IMEC make it difficult for countries to bank on this as a “game-changer.” India’s well-known opposition to China’s BRI is unlikely to be reciprocated by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia, who continue to strengthen multibillion-dollar infrastructure partnerships with China. 

For these economies, IMEC is not about alignment but more about adding another connectivity test-case that can help Gulf economies advance their multinational trade and connectivity needs. Unlike IMEC, the BRI represents a long-standing presence on the global scale, spreading over a decade. It is also a sprawling connectivity plan that has withstood downward economic pressure, braved the challenges of COVID-19, and come through on several debt-management concerns of participating countries. 

The impression that a contentious IMEC can suddenly pull together economies and regions through integrated railroads and ports is a far cry. Core areas of contention include a dire lack of clarity on financing and contingencies, bringing into question the presumed viability of this multinational connectivity feat. Moreover, it is unclear if this initiative can singlehandedly succeed in addressing the apprehensions of middle and low-income powers that often find themselves on the fringes.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • IMEC
  • India
  • Israel
  • G20
  • Saudi Arabia
Hannan Hussain

Hannan Hussain

Writer and author.

Most Read

All
Although the background information does not indicate direct US involvement, considering the broader geopolitical context, it is plausible that the US would have an indirect impact. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab El-Hajj)

Did 'Israel', US fight a proxy war with China in South Asia during the India-Pakistan escalation?

  • Feature
  • 19 May 2025
The two countries need to sit down and resolve the crisis with maturity, to consider carefully that they could be being manipulated to be easily dominated. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Algeria and Mali, divided and almost conquered

  • Opinion
  • 25 May 2025
The spirit of Bandung: 70 years on

The spirit of Bandung: 70 years on

  • Opinion
  • 18 May 2025
Trump and Biden both pretended to be fighting Netanyahu

Trump and Biden both pretended to be fighting Netanyahu

  • Analysis
  • 28 May 2025

Coverage

All
The Ummah's Martyrs

More from this writer

All
Colombia's Silk Road turn: Breaking the chains of US hegemony

Colombia's Silk Road turn: Breaking the chains of US hegemony

Israeli manpower shortages offer a firm reckoning of its Gaza genocide

Israeli manpower shortages offer a firm reckoning of Gaza genocide

Why Trump’s Panama Canal threats don’t add up.

Why Trump’s Panama Canal threats don’t add up.

Taking provocations head-on

Taking provocations head-on

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS