Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
Qatari PM: We must not surrender to the arrogance of extremists and pursue our quest for a 'two-state solution'
Qatari PM: The only path to peace begins through negotiations and a ceasefire
Qatari PM: We demand that the Security Council assume its historical responsibility, as silence in the face of the law of the jungle undermines international peace and destabilizes the UN system
Qatari PM: The extremists who rule "Israel" do not care about the lives of the "hostages"; otherwise, how can the timing and location of the attack be explained?
Qatari PM: 'Israel's' attack on Hamas leaders in Doha is a violation of Qatar's sovereignty
Qatari PM: The ongoing [Israeli] violations only prove one thing: the Israeli officials' drunkenness on power amid impunity
Yemeni Ministry of Health: The death toll from the Israeli aggression on Sanaa and Al-Jawf Governorate has risen to 46, in addition to 165 injuries, including a large number of women and children, according to a non-final toll
Representative of Russia to the Security Council: What happened is not a coincidence, but rather a logical consequence of the complete impunity 'Israel' enjoys
Representative of Russia to the Security Council: What prevents 'Israel' from attacking any capital city in the world after bombing Doha?
Acting US Representative to the Security Council: Trump assured the Emir of Qatar and the Prime Minister that such an incident would not be repeated on Qatari soil

Why IMEC could become a fading memory

  • Hannan Hussain Hannan Hussain
  • Source: Al Mayadeen English
  • 18 Sep 2023 17:23
5 Min Read

The tall promises of the IMEC about a 40 percent cut in India-Europe trade time deserve to be questioned for several reasons.

  • x
  • Why IMEC could become a fading memory
    Why IMEC could become a fading memory

In a show of triumph on the sidelines of the recently concluded G20 (Group of 20) Leaders’ Summit in New Delhi, India, and its partners announced an overly ambitious multinational rail and shipping project. The initiative, called the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), compromises of an eastern component linking India to the Arabian Gulf, and the Arabian Gulf to Europe on the northern front. “Across the corridor, we envision driving existing trade and manufacturing and strengthening food security and supply chains. Our approach aims to unlock new investments from partners, including the private sector, and spur the creation of quality jobs,” read a factsheet from the White House.

For all the noise and premature success narrative about cross-border ‘ship-to-rail’ transit networks, the contours of this wishful arrangement and its financial viability are increasingly under question.

Consider the deep-seated geopolitics of the corridor itself. Extending transportation links from the Middle East to India does not automatically guarantee ‘connectivity’ for an entire region at large. For instance, India is centered within South Asia, a region also home to Pakistan alongside several other nations with geographically strategic locations. By reducing South Asian connectivity to India alone, IMEC carries the deliberate impression of sidestepping connectivity for all in a bid to guarantee railway and port linkages to a single state. 

Similarly, Washington and New Delhi’s outsized lobbying for this corridor merits a closer look at the underlying motivations. Consider the Israeli occupation: it is deliberately billed as a key connectivity partner under IMEC, a blatant attempt to normalize the inclusion of an illegal occupation within a so-called trade and connectivity “game-changer.” In truth, this is another conscious effort by Washington to leverage the connectivity cover to force convergence of trade interests with the Israeli occupation. Let us be clear: none of these political motivations align with the stated goal of IMEC – to catalyze the “transformative integration of Asia, Europe and the Middle East.” 

Related News

The Supply Lines War

Competing global economic initiatives: A tale of two routes

Representatives of participating countries including the United States, India, European Union, and Arab states are also set to meet in the next sixty days to develop an action plan to produce a corridor timetable. By branching off into discussions, IMEC simultaneously raises the specter of implicit lobbying for interests that cater to the aspirations of pro-occupation forces, and threatens unwarranted tolerance of the Israeli occupation that has laid siege on Palestinian lands, rights and freedoms for decades.

On economics, tall promises about a 40 percent cut in India-Europe trade time deserve to be questioned. These are premature assumptions when sources of financing and cost-sharing mechanisms among states are yet to be hammered out. India appears to be taking a backseat on all these big issues, insisting that it will be connected by railroads but refusing to build them. Meanwhile, several European economies are facing domestic economic exigencies at home, resulting in fast-shrinking space for funds mobilization and drastic limits on generous overseas spending. The United States is in no position to punch beyond its weight either, given a sharply divided Congress on spending excesses and the recent pains of alarming debt. 

Even if Washington was able to deliver billions on its part, a dismal track record of infrastructure investment struggles to make the case for competence. Look no further than the much hyped-up Build Back Better World (B3W): it was sold as a sustainable counterweight to China’s massive Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Fast forward, B3W is widely seen as dead on arrival with little prospects of growth, expansion or generous financing. It is here that Europe and Washington’s collective emphasis on IMEC is glaring proof that priorities have shifted in a completely different direction. 

As such, considerable ambiguity on the prospective investment and trade returns of IMEC make it difficult for countries to bank on this as a “game-changer.” India’s well-known opposition to China’s BRI is unlikely to be reciprocated by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Saudi Arabia, who continue to strengthen multibillion-dollar infrastructure partnerships with China. 

For these economies, IMEC is not about alignment but more about adding another connectivity test-case that can help Gulf economies advance their multinational trade and connectivity needs. Unlike IMEC, the BRI represents a long-standing presence on the global scale, spreading over a decade. It is also a sprawling connectivity plan that has withstood downward economic pressure, braved the challenges of COVID-19, and come through on several debt-management concerns of participating countries. 

The impression that a contentious IMEC can suddenly pull together economies and regions through integrated railroads and ports is a far cry. Core areas of contention include a dire lack of clarity on financing and contingencies, bringing into question the presumed viability of this multinational connectivity feat. Moreover, it is unclear if this initiative can singlehandedly succeed in addressing the apprehensions of middle and low-income powers that often find themselves on the fringes.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • IMEC
  • India
  • Israel
  • G20
  • Saudi Arabia
Hannan Hussain

Hannan Hussain

Writer and author.

Most Read

All
Why Russia and China are NOT Imperialist: A Marxist-Leninist Assessment of Imperialism’s Development Since 1917

Why Russia and China are NOT Imperialist: A Marxist-Leninist Assessment of Imperialism’s Development Since 1917

  • Analysis
  • 4 Sep 2025
The Coming War On Iran Will Be Regional, Perhaps International

The coming war on Iran will be regional, perhaps international

  • Opinion
  • 2 Sep 2025
In the immediate aftermath of Parubiy’s slaying, claims emerged he had months earlier requested formal protection from the SBU, only to be rebuffed. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

The Ukrainian neo-Nazi who knew too much?

  • Opinion
  • 5 Sep 2025
The reek of desperation hangs over Albanese’s Iran conspiracy theories

The reek of desperation hangs over Albanese’s Iran conspiracy theories

  • Opinion
  • 31 Aug 2025

Coverage

All
War on Iran

More from this writer

All
Iran's opposition to the NPT is justified due to the E3’s glaring silence on actual challenges to nuclear security in the region. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab el-Hajj)

Iran and the NPT: Opposition justified

Regional peace with the occupation a recipe for disaster

Regional peace with the occupation a recipe for disaster

Countries witness to Netanyahu’s blatant Gaza takeover pledge need to put their commitments into action. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Why Netanyahu’s Gaza takeover merits substantial pushback

For a retreating US administration to tout peace against a track record of aggression and belligerence is a recipe for further unrest. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Why the US is unqualified to promote peace between Thailand and Cambodia

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS