Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
Factions' statement: The attendees agreed to support and continue implementing the ceasefire agreement measures, including the withdrawal of the occupation and lifting the siege.
Factions' statement: Calling for an end to all forms of torture and violations against prisoners in occupation prisons and the necessity of obligating the occupation to do so.
Statement: The current moment is crucial, making the meeting a true turning point toward national unity in defense of our people and their right to life, dignity, and freedom.
Factions' statement: Call for an urgent meeting of all Palestinian forces and factions to agree on a national strategy.
Factions' statement: Continuing joint work to unify visions and positions to confront the challenges facing the Palestinian cause.
Statement of the factions: Emphasis on the unity of the Palestinian political system and the independent national decision.
Statement: Approval to establish an international committee to oversee the financing and implementation of the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.
Statement: The committee is responsible for managing life and services in cooperation with Arab brothers and international institutions, based on transparency and accountability.
Resistance factions' statement: Agreement to hand over the administration of the Gaza Strip to a temporary Palestinian committee of independent technocrats.
Al Mayadeen's correspondent: Two people martyred in the Israeli airstrike that targeted a vehicle in Toul.

Competing global economic initiatives: A tale of two routes

  • Mohamad Zreik Mohamad Zreik
  • Source: Al Mayadeen English
  • 16 Jun 2024 14:56
  • 2 Shares
4 Min Read

While the BRI represents a comprehensive and inclusive effort to foster global economic integration and cooperation, the IMEC emerges as a politically charged response, fraught with strategic miscalculations and geopolitical instability.

Listen
  • x
  • Competing global economic initiatives: A tale of two routes
    The BRI vs. the IMEC (Illustrated by Batoul Chamas; Al Mayadeen English)

In recent years, two major economic initiatives have emerged in Asia, particularly in West Asia: China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). These initiatives represent a strategic contest between global powers vying for influence and economic dominance in a rapidly changing world.

The Belt and Road Initiative, conceived by Chinese President Xi Jinping, is a modern resurrection of the ancient Silk Road. This initiative aims to connect China to the rest of the world through extensive infrastructure investments, including ports, roads, railways, and industrial zones. The historical Silk Road, dating back to the 2nd century BCE, was a network of trade routes linking China with Europe, passing through Central Asia and the Middle East. BRI is poised to be the largest infrastructure project in human history, with China investing billions of dollars to facilitate global trade and economic integration.

In contrast, the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, announced by the United States at last year's G20 Summit, appears as a hastily assembled response to counter China's growing influence. Unlike the meticulously planned and geographically stable BRI, the US initiative lacks a coherent geographic and strategic foundation. The announcement was made abruptly, without thorough consultations with the countries and regions it intends to involve. This contrasts sharply with the inclusive approach of the BRI, which has seen active participation from 150 countries, as demonstrated at the 2019 Belt and Road Forum in Beijing.

The BRI is anchored in principles of economic cooperation, peaceful coexistence, and conflict resolution. China's role in facilitating the Saudi-Iranian rapprochement highlights its commitment to removing political obstacles that could hinder the initiative's progress. By fostering dialogue and prioritizing economic development, China seeks to create a win-win scenario for all participating nations.

Related News

How Islamophobia became a tool of Western politics

Manufacturing civil war: The Zionist doctrine to destroy resistance

On the other hand, the IMEC seems more focused on geopolitical confrontation than economic cooperation. The United States has revived the Quad (QUAD) dialogue, involving the US, India, Japan, and Australia, as a strategic counterweight to China's influence. Additionally, the US has fostered a new alliance termed "2I 2U," comprising India, "Israel", the UAE, and the United States. This alliance underscores the geopolitical maneuvering inherent in the India-Haifa Route, aiming to balance China's rising power in the region.

However, the practicalities of the IMEC raise significant concerns. The route begins in India, traversing the Arabian Sea to Dubai, then overland to Saudi Arabia and Jordan, culminating at the port of Haifa in "Israel". This path bypasses Pakistan and China to appease India and avoids Iran and Turkey to placate "Israel". Such geopolitical considerations undermine the route's viability and stability. 

Moreover, the security situation in the Gulf, marked by US-Iranian tensions, further jeopardizes the stability of the proposed route. The recent Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus has heightened regional volatility, casting doubt on the feasibility of the IMEC amid such geopolitical turbulence.

In stark contrast, the BRI's success lies in its focus on economic integration and development, devoid of political and military entanglements. The initiative's comprehensive and inclusive framework seeks to establish peaceful and mutually beneficial relations among the nations along the Silk Road. By prioritizing infrastructure development and economic cooperation, the BRI promotes long-term stability and prosperity.

The US initiative, however, appears reactionary and strategically shortsighted. Its hurried announcement at the G20 Summit, aimed at undermining the BRI, reflects a lack of coherent vision and planning. The geopolitical underpinnings of the IMEC overshadow its economic objectives, reducing it to a tool of political maneuvering rather than a genuine development initiative.

The contrasting approaches of China's BRI and the IMEC highlight the fundamental differences in their strategic visions. While the BRI represents a comprehensive and inclusive effort to foster global economic integration and cooperation, the IMEC emerges as a politically charged response, fraught with strategic miscalculations and geopolitical instability. As the world navigates this era of strategic competition, the long-term success of these initiatives will depend on their ability to promote genuine economic development and peaceful coexistence, rather than geopolitical confrontation and dominance.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • United States
  • IMEC
  • belt and road initiative
  • G7
  • US
  • India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor
  • US President Joe Biden
  • China
  • BRI
  • Chinese President Xi Jinping
Mohamad Zreik

Mohamad Zreik

Postdoctoral and Research Fellow at the Center for Middle East Studies at Sun Yat-sen University.

Most Read

All
Ellison and Blair are working together to open up huge data-mines for profit-making, and the British NHS is a key prize. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Who is Larry Ellison? And how does he tie digital ID, Trump, Blair and genocide in Levant?

  • Opinion
  • 13 Oct 2025
Zionists Fundamentally Misread Iran Due To Their Own Echo Chambers

Zionists fundamentally misread Iran due to their own echo chambers

  • Analysis
  • 15 Oct 2025
Manufacturing civil war: The Zionist doctrine to destroy resistance

Manufacturing civil war: The Zionist doctrine to destroy resistance

  • Opinion
  • 21 Oct 2025
For the ALBA-TCP, this dynamic confirms that the Summit of the Americas is a space “tutored by imperial interests.” (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab el-Hajj)

Exclusion of Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua from X summit of Americas: Fracture in hemispheric diplomacy

  • Opinion
  • 12 Oct 2025

Coverage

All
Gaza: An Epic of Resilience and Valor

More from this writer

All
China’s role in post-Assad Syria: Respecting the will of the Syrian people

China’s role in post-Assad Syria: Respecting the will of the Syrian people

One of the significant barriers to China's potential role in Lebanon is the overwhelming influence of the United States. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab El-Hajj)

A Complex Triangle: How US influence hinders China's economic role in Lebanon

Advancing Unity and Prosperity at the Tenth Ministerial Meeting of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum

Advancing Unity and Prosperity at the Tenth Ministerial Meeting of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum

China's growing influence in the Middle East: The Saudi-Iranian agreement and its implications

China's growing influence in the Middle East: The Saudi-Iranian agreement and its implications

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS