Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
President al-Mashat: Our armed forces, represented by our air defenses, will soon turn the Zionist enemy’s aircraft into a subject of ridicule.
President al-Mashat: Good news about the Zionist enemy’s aircraft used in aggression against our country will reach you soon, God willing.
President al-Mashat: Our armed forces will be able to deal with hostile Zionist aircraft without causing any harm to air or maritime navigation.
President al-Mashat: To ensure the safety of airliners, they must avoid navigating along the routes used by the Zionist entity to carry out aggression against our country.
Yemeni President Mahdi al-Mashat: For the safety of air and maritime navigation in areas where our armed forces operate, we have directed that the routes used by the Zionist enemy to attack our country be designated as dangerous.
Hamas official says despite this, Hamas leadership is currently undertaking a thorough review of the new proposal
Hamas official says the response fails to meet any of the just and legitimate demands of our people
Hamas official says it is clear that the Israeli response fundamentally seeks to entrench the occupation
Reuters citing Hamas official: Group received Israeli response to Witkoff proposal
Sources to Al Mayadeen: The news regarding a press conference tonight by the head of the Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip, Khalil Al-Hayya, is false.

Competing global economic initiatives: A tale of two routes

  • Mohamad Zreik Mohamad Zreik
  • Source: Al Mayadeen English
  • 16 Jun 2024 14:56
  • 2 Shares
4 Min Read

While the BRI represents a comprehensive and inclusive effort to foster global economic integration and cooperation, the IMEC emerges as a politically charged response, fraught with strategic miscalculations and geopolitical instability.

Listen
  • x
  • Competing global economic initiatives: A tale of two routes
    The BRI vs. the IMEC (Illustrated by Batoul Chamas; Al Mayadeen English)

In recent years, two major economic initiatives have emerged in Asia, particularly in West Asia: China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). These initiatives represent a strategic contest between global powers vying for influence and economic dominance in a rapidly changing world.

The Belt and Road Initiative, conceived by Chinese President Xi Jinping, is a modern resurrection of the ancient Silk Road. This initiative aims to connect China to the rest of the world through extensive infrastructure investments, including ports, roads, railways, and industrial zones. The historical Silk Road, dating back to the 2nd century BCE, was a network of trade routes linking China with Europe, passing through Central Asia and the Middle East. BRI is poised to be the largest infrastructure project in human history, with China investing billions of dollars to facilitate global trade and economic integration.

In contrast, the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, announced by the United States at last year's G20 Summit, appears as a hastily assembled response to counter China's growing influence. Unlike the meticulously planned and geographically stable BRI, the US initiative lacks a coherent geographic and strategic foundation. The announcement was made abruptly, without thorough consultations with the countries and regions it intends to involve. This contrasts sharply with the inclusive approach of the BRI, which has seen active participation from 150 countries, as demonstrated at the 2019 Belt and Road Forum in Beijing.

The BRI is anchored in principles of economic cooperation, peaceful coexistence, and conflict resolution. China's role in facilitating the Saudi-Iranian rapprochement highlights its commitment to removing political obstacles that could hinder the initiative's progress. By fostering dialogue and prioritizing economic development, China seeks to create a win-win scenario for all participating nations.

Related News

Colombia's Silk Road turn: Breaking the chains of US hegemony

The fulfillment of Trumps dreams

On the other hand, the IMEC seems more focused on geopolitical confrontation than economic cooperation. The United States has revived the Quad (QUAD) dialogue, involving the US, India, Japan, and Australia, as a strategic counterweight to China's influence. Additionally, the US has fostered a new alliance termed "2I 2U," comprising India, "Israel", the UAE, and the United States. This alliance underscores the geopolitical maneuvering inherent in the India-Haifa Route, aiming to balance China's rising power in the region.

However, the practicalities of the IMEC raise significant concerns. The route begins in India, traversing the Arabian Sea to Dubai, then overland to Saudi Arabia and Jordan, culminating at the port of Haifa in "Israel". This path bypasses Pakistan and China to appease India and avoids Iran and Turkey to placate "Israel". Such geopolitical considerations undermine the route's viability and stability. 

Moreover, the security situation in the Gulf, marked by US-Iranian tensions, further jeopardizes the stability of the proposed route. The recent Israeli attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus has heightened regional volatility, casting doubt on the feasibility of the IMEC amid such geopolitical turbulence.

In stark contrast, the BRI's success lies in its focus on economic integration and development, devoid of political and military entanglements. The initiative's comprehensive and inclusive framework seeks to establish peaceful and mutually beneficial relations among the nations along the Silk Road. By prioritizing infrastructure development and economic cooperation, the BRI promotes long-term stability and prosperity.

The US initiative, however, appears reactionary and strategically shortsighted. Its hurried announcement at the G20 Summit, aimed at undermining the BRI, reflects a lack of coherent vision and planning. The geopolitical underpinnings of the IMEC overshadow its economic objectives, reducing it to a tool of political maneuvering rather than a genuine development initiative.

The contrasting approaches of China's BRI and the IMEC highlight the fundamental differences in their strategic visions. While the BRI represents a comprehensive and inclusive effort to foster global economic integration and cooperation, the IMEC emerges as a politically charged response, fraught with strategic miscalculations and geopolitical instability. As the world navigates this era of strategic competition, the long-term success of these initiatives will depend on their ability to promote genuine economic development and peaceful coexistence, rather than geopolitical confrontation and dominance.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • United States
  • IMEC
  • belt and road initiative
  • G7
  • US
  • India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor
  • US President Joe Biden
  • China
  • BRI
  • Chinese President Xi Jinping
Mohamad Zreik

Mohamad Zreik

Postdoctoral and Research Fellow at the Center for Middle East Studies at Sun Yat-sen University.

Most Read

All
Although the background information does not indicate direct US involvement, considering the broader geopolitical context, it is plausible that the US would have an indirect impact. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab El-Hajj)

Did 'Israel', US fight a proxy war with China in South Asia during the India-Pakistan escalation?

  • Feature
  • 19 May 2025
The two countries need to sit down and resolve the crisis with maturity, to consider carefully that they could be being manipulated to be easily dominated. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

Algeria and Mali, divided and almost conquered

  • Opinion
  • 25 May 2025
The spirit of Bandung: 70 years on

The spirit of Bandung: 70 years on

  • Opinion
  • 18 May 2025
Trump and Biden both pretended to be fighting Netanyahu

Trump and Biden both pretended to be fighting Netanyahu

  • Analysis
  • 28 May 2025

Coverage

All
The Ummah's Martyrs

More from this writer

All
China’s role in post-Assad Syria: Respecting the will of the Syrian people

China’s role in post-Assad Syria: Respecting the will of the Syrian people

One of the significant barriers to China's potential role in Lebanon is the overwhelming influence of the United States. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab El-Hajj)

A Complex Triangle: How US influence hinders China's economic role in Lebanon

Advancing Unity and Prosperity at the Tenth Ministerial Meeting of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum

Advancing Unity and Prosperity at the Tenth Ministerial Meeting of the China-Arab States Cooperation Forum

China's growing influence in the Middle East: The Saudi-Iranian agreement and its implications

China's growing influence in the Middle East: The Saudi-Iranian agreement and its implications

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS