Al Mayadeen English

  • Ar
  • Es
  • x
Al Mayadeen English

Slogan

  • News
    • Politics
    • Economy
    • Sports
    • Arts&Culture
    • Health
    • Miscellaneous
    • Technology
    • Environment
  • Articles
    • Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Blog
    • Features
  • Videos
    • NewsFeed
    • Video Features
    • Explainers
    • TV
    • Digital Series
  • Infographs
  • In Pictures
  • • LIVE
News
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Sports
  • Arts&Culture
  • Health
  • Miscellaneous
  • Technology
  • Environment
Articles
  • Opinion
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • Features
Videos
  • NewsFeed
  • Video Features
  • Explainers
  • TV
  • Digital Series
Infographs
In Pictures
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Asia-Pacific
  • Europe
  • Latin America
  • MENA
  • Palestine
  • US & Canada
BREAKING
Washington to the Security Council: The goal was to destroy Iran's uranium enrichment capacity and prevent the threat of Tehran obtaining and using a nuclear weapon
Lebanese Health Ministry: 1 woman martyred, 11 wounded in Israeli strike on residential apartment in Nabatieh, South Lebanon.
Al Mayadeen's correspondent: Four civilians injured in Israeli strike that targeted house in Nabatieh al-Fawqa, South Lebanon.
Al Mayadeen's correspondent in South Lebanon: Israeli warplanes launch strikes on regions of al-Mahmoudiyah, al-Khardali
Al Mayadeen's correspondent in South Lebanon: Israeli aircraft execute series of strikes in Kfar Tibnit, South Lebanon.
Iranian ambassador in Beijing to Al Mayadeen: We hope that Europe and the US give up their illegal actions and authoritarian hegemony.
Al Mayadeen's correspondent: Israeli shelling targets displaced persons' tent in Al-Mawasi, Khan Younis, casualties were reported
IOF storm Jalazone camp, north of Al Bireh city in the occupied West Bank
Israeli media: A severe incident reported in Gaza some time ago
Israeli media: Military evacuation helicopters are transporting injured soldiers from Khan Younis

Biden's peace bluff means there's no way out for Netanyahu

  • Tom Fowdy Tom Fowdy
  • Source: Al Mayadeen English
  • 7 Jun 2024 14:20
  • 1 Shares
4 Min Read

No matter what happens, it seems quite obvious that "Israel" is losing this war diplomatically and politically, even with the backing of the United States.

Listen
  • x
  • "Israel" can lose by agreeing to peace, or they can lose by winning. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Batoul Chamas)

The Biden administration last week proposed a "ceasefire" deal which it claimed had originated from "Israel", seeking a pathway to ending the war on Gaza by guaranteeing the release of hostages, arguing that the military capability of Hamas had been destroyed. Although swiftly dismissed by Tel Aviv, Washington quickly rallied its allies and other Arab states to support the measure. This, however, is wishful thinking, given that the US was clearly being disingenuous with the idea that "Israel proposed it."

First, the Biden administration has a well-established political strategy of effectively lying on behalf of "Israel". The White House effectively sets red lines, but moves the goalposts when Netanyahu subsequently violates them anyway. The administration claimed that it opposed an IOF invasion of Rafah, but when that happened, they claimed the "red line had been crossed," among numerous other things. Every action the US has taken in regards to the conflict has been merely symbolic, if not outright disingenuous, while nonetheless keeping support for Tel Aviv unconditional.

However, domestic politics comes first in the United States, and the Biden administration is now seeking to bring the war to an end, or to at least given the appearance of such, because the growing backlash against it will undermine Biden's re-election interests, as well as his attempt to claim a massive political scalp by upgrading ties with Saudi Arabia and pushing normalisation with "Israel". In doing so, the real intention of this ceasefire proposal has been to comprehensively isolate Benjamin Netanyahu and back him into a corner, as toothless as this may be. As Reuters noted, "The decision to announce unilaterally - an unusual step for the United States to take with a close ally - was deliberate, officials say, and narrowed the room for Israel or Hamas to back away from the deal."

Related News

Which hedge fund owns this sea?

What the deep strike on Russia reveals about NATO strategy and Trump’s diplomatic deadlock

However, it is politically untenable for Netanyahu to possibly consider ceasing the fighting at this stage, for he is aware this will certainly mean the end of his tenure in office. Already, hardliners in his cabinet have threatened to resign over it and jeopardise the ruling coalition. For his administration, agreeing to a ceasefire now is an effective return to a pre-October 7th status quo that amounts to "co-existence" between "Israel" and Hamas in Gaza, and this is impossible because Netanyahu has repeatedly and publicly affirmed that the goal of his invasion has been to change the political status quo in the Strip. 

This means first. the destruction of Hamas, and second, what he has described as a "new security regime" in the strip, which should be described as a full military occupation in all but name. The ceasefire proposal, however, requires that "Israel" withdraw from the populated areas of the Gaza Strip. This means ceding political control, and therefore contravenes his maximalist objectives. Already, "Israel" has seized control of Gaza’s entire border area and therefore is preparing to establish de-facto sovereignty over it. It is precisely for this reason that the most hardline Zionists will not agree to it, because their broader objective is to effectively incorporate and settle the territory.

Therefore, a retreat from this would be nothing less than a huge political defeat for him, a loss of legitimacy, and an upheaval of the political regime he has built. All in pursuit of these goals, Netanyahu has overseen the global ruination of "Israel’s" reputation. To turn round and say, "Let’s go back to square one" means that all of that would have been absolutely in vain. He would have "nothing to show" for this "return to status quo" outcome, and therefore his only perceived pathway to political survival is the perpetuation of conflict towards attaining the goals the hardliners so crave.

Either way, this makes one statement true: No matter what happens, it seems quite obvious that "Israel" is losing this war diplomatically and politically, even with the backing of the United States. It can either stop now and cut its losses, thus ending the Benjamin Netanyahu coalition, or it can continue onwards in its extreme brutality and disregard for human life, which will only beckon deeper isolation. Biden has tried to box Netanyahu in, but in fact he’s already done that to himself. There’s no easy way out.

"Israel" can lose by agreeing to peace, or they can lose by winning. 

The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Mayadeen’s editorial stance.
  • Joe Biden
  • Benjamin Netanyahu
  • Israel
  • Palestine
  • war on Gaza
Tom Fowdy

Tom Fowdy

British journalist, columnist, and political analyst, with a specialist focus on Asia topics. He resides in South Korea.

War on Gaza

War on Gaza

Most Read

All
Absent a full-scale American war on the Islamic Republic, Netanyahu has set up his regime and himself for a historic humiliation. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab el-Hajj)

The clock is ticking down to 'Israel’s' capitulation

  • Opinion
  • 18 Jun 2025
'Israel' burns its deck while Iran plays its cards right

'Israel' burns its deck while Iran plays its cards right

  • Opinion
  • 17 Jun 2025
Decoding Iran’s strategy in current war

Decoding Iran’s strategy in current war

  • Opinion
  • 19 Jun 2025
Given that "Israel" has used Palestinian oppression to prove its rejection of peace, Tehran’s retaliation on "Israel" give Israeli terrorism the pushback and counter that it truly deserves. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Ali al-Hadi Shmeiss)

Why Iranian counterattacks will take Israeli terrorism head-on

  • Opinion
  • 14 Jun 2025

Coverage

All
War on Iran

More from this writer

All
Netanyahu has already fallen into the trap of a huge cat and mouse, or a “whack-a-mole” game, which is hugely costly and simply unsustainable. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Ali Al-Hadi Shmeiss)

Netanyahu has gravely miscalculated invading Lebanon

Britain's Arms Restrictions are symbolic yet send a meaningful message

Britain's Arms Restrictions are symbolic yet send a meaningful message

Essentially, the game goes “You have done X against us, therefore we will salami slice your land further.” (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab El-Hajj)

West Bank attacks lay bare what Netanyahu's endgame is for Palestinian territories

The US wants damage control, but Netanyahu wants conflict because it is in his political interest to do so. (Al Mayadeen English; Illustrated by Zeinab El-Hajj)

It's America, not 'Israel' who wants a ceasefire

Al Mayadeen English

Al Mayadeen is an Arab Independent Media Satellite Channel.

All Rights Reserved

  • x
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Authors
Android
iOS