Amos Yadlin, the head of the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies, spoke out on Saturday regarding a number of concerning fronts in the confrontation against Iran and Hezbollah.

In an interview with Channel 12, Yadlin said there was some confusion in "Israel" vis-à-vis the Iranian nuclear program, saying that the confrontation that should worry us is on a number of fronts.

The first front, according to Yadlin, concerns Iran's ability to enrich uranium up to 60%, pointing out that "Israel" is currently in a situation wherein it doesn't know which way Tehran will go.

Yadlin wondered whether "Israel" should support a return to the deal that will bring Iran back on the nuclear level but will give them a lot of money, or support a break from the deal, which is "Israel's" formal policy. But then "what would we do if Iran enriches up to 90% or withdraws from the NPT?"

Al Monitor had published an article by Israeli commentator Ben Caspit, discussing the division in the Israeli leadership regarding the Iranian nuclear deal, clarifying that the Israeli leadership cannot reach a consensus on whether or not the JCPOA's revival is beneficial for them.

Yadlin also added that the second disconcerting front, which was not given enough attention in "Israel" is Hezbollah's precision missiles, while the third front is Syria.

Yadlin added that he has seen Israeli domestic politics and where things are headed, pointing out that the occupation has great challenges ahead of it before the end of the year.