Trump to sue BBC for up to $5 billion over edited speech
US President Donald Trump is preparing to sue the BBC for up to $5 billion over a documentary edit of his January 6, 2021, speech, prompting one of the greatest crises in the broadcaster’s history.
-
United States President Donald Trump speaks to reporters on Air Force One on his way to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, on November 14, 2025. (AP)
United States President Donald Trump announced that he is poised to file a lawsuit against the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) next week, seeking damages of up to $5 billion, over a misleading edit of a speech he made on 6 January 2021.
The dispute centers on a documentary broadcast by the BBC’s flagship program Panorama titled “Trump: A Second Chance?”, which aired in October 2024. The documentary spliced together three excerpts of his 6 January speech, creating the impression that he had explicitly incited violent action during the attack on the US Capitol.
In his remarks aboard Air Force One, Trump said, “We’ll sue them for anywhere between $1 billion and $5 billion, probably sometime next week.”
“They changed the words coming out of my mouth,” the US President said.
The BBC has admitted that the edit was an “error of judgment” and issued a personal apology from its Chair, Samir Shah, to the White House. However, the broadcaster rejected Trump’s defamation demands, stating that it believes there is no legal basis for his claim.
Crisis at the BBC and UK political fallout
The controversy has triggered one of the most severe crises in the broadcaster’s history. Director‑General Tim Davie and Head of News Deborah Turness both resigned amid the fallout.
British Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the BBC’s apology was “right and necessary” and emphasised that the broadcaster must “get its house in order.”
Meanwhile, questions are being raised about whether licence‑fee payers’ funds could be used to settle any damage award, something that could further inflame public and political scrutiny of the public broadcaster.
Read more: BBC apologizes to Trump but rejects his $1bln legal threat
Legal obstacles ahead
Although Trump has signaled his intent to pursue litigation, legal experts caution that mounting a successful claim will face significant hurdles. The BBC argues that the documentary was not broadcast in the United States, limiting US jurisdiction, and that in the United Kingdom, the statute of limitations for defamation may have expired.
Moreover, because Trump was re‑elected in 2024, the BBC contends that it cannot demonstrate he suffered reputational harm in a way required under defamation law.
Nonetheless, from Trump’s perspective, the case may serve less as a guaranteed legal victory than as a means of leveraging public attention and exerting pressure on one of the world’s major media institutions.
Geopolitical and media‑sector implications
The battle between Trump and the BBC underscores broader strategic dynamics between US political figures and global media outlets. A successful lawsuit or even a high‑profile settlement could embolden similar claims by political figures against public broadcasters, potentially reshaping editorial practice and risk management within major news organizations.
For the BBC, the scandal raises questions of trust, impartiality, and governance, especially in an era of heightened sensitivity around media bias and disinformation.
Read more: BBC board appointees under review after scandal on Trump bias